系部：英语系

职称：讲师

职务：院长助理、系主任

办公室：外语中心701

邮箱：wesleyxmj@njtech.edu.cn

教育背景

文学博士（浙江大学，2018）

文学硕士（安徽师范大学，2008）

大学本科（安徽师范大学，2005）

研究经历

访问学者（美国麻省理工学院，2022.2-2023.2）

研究学者（美国凯斯西储大学，2015.2-2015.5）

联合培养博士生（荷兰阿姆斯特丹自由大学，2014.9-2015.8）

研究助理（荷兰格罗宁根大学，2013.4-2015.5）

兼任职务：中国先秦史学会国学双语研究会理事、国际认知语言学会会员、国际修辞史学会会员

研究兴趣：认知语言学、比较修辞学

主要科研项目

[1] 江苏省社会科学基金项目（2021-2023），“跨学科视域下庄子与柏拉图哲学修辞比较研究”，主持人，在研

[2] 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目（2021-2024），“‘轴心时代’中希哲学家修辞论辩的跨学科比较研究”，主持人，在研

代表性成果

论文

[1] Xiang, M. (2015). Review of Esther Pascual: Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 709-716. (SSCI, A&HCI)

[2] Xiang, M., & Pascual, E. (2016). Debate with Zhuangzi: Expository questions as fictive interaction blends in an old Chinese text. Pragmatics, 26(1), 137-162. (SSCI, A&HCI)

[3] Xiang, M. (2016). Real, imaginary, or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in an early Daoist text and its pictorial version. In Esther Pascual & Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction (pp. 63-86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

[4] Xu, J., & Xiang, M.* (2019). Review of Blending technologies in second language classrooms, Palgrave Macmillan, Don Hinkelman. London, England (2018), Pp. Xxxii + 407. System, 81, 216-218. (SSCI)

[5] Xiang, M., & Ma, B. (2020). How can I persuade you without making self-assertions? A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the use of fictive questions in an early Daoist text. In Vera da Silva Sinha, Ana Moreno-Núñez, & Zhen Tian (Eds.), Language, Thought and Identity - Signs of Life (pp. 249–273). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

[6] 林美珍、项名健、马博森.（2020）.《自闭症谱系障碍语言创新性研究》述介. 当代语言学，22(2)，303-307. (CSSCI)

[7] Xiang, M., Pascual, E., & Ma, B. (2022). Who’s speaking for whom? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an early Daoist text. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 23(1), 29-53. (SSCI, A&HCI)

[8] Xiang, M. (2023). Book Review: Paula Pérez Sobrino, Jeannette Littlemore and Samantha Ford, Unpacking Creativity: The Power of Figurative Communication in Advertising. Discourse Studies, 25(1), 141-143. (SSCI)

[9] Guo, Y., & Xiang, M.* (2023). Investigating the factors influencing the comprehension of idiom variation in a second language. English Language Teaching, 16(2), 43-52.

专著

[1] Xiang, M. (2023). Fictive questions in the Zhuangzi: A cognitive rhetorical study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/ftl.18

国际会议论文

[1] Xiang, M. Real, imaginary, or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in an early Daoist text and its pictorial version presented at The Conversation Frame Expert Workshop, 5-6 June 2014, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

[2] Xiang, M. & E. Pascual. Who’s reading? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an old Chinese text presented at the 5th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 29-31 July 2014, Lancaster University, UK and the 2nd Fictive Interaction Symposium, 2-3 April 2015, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.

[3] Xiang, M. & E. Pascual. Translating the invisible: Fictive questions in an Old Chinese text and its English translations presented at the 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 20-25 July 2015, Northumbria University, UK.

[4] Xiang, M. How can I persuade you? A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the use of fictive questions in an old Chinese text presented at the 7th International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (DGKL/GCLA), 5-7 October 2016, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

[5] Xiang, M. & E. Pascual. Can rhetorical questions have matched polarity? Evidence from classical Chinese presented at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference, 16-21 July 2017, Belfast, UK.

[6] Xiang, M. Who’s speaking? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an early Daoist text presented at the 4th International Conference on Figurative Thought and Language, 23-26 October 2018, Braga, Portugal.

[7] Xiang, M. & A. Bonifazi. The form is the message: A comparative cognitive rhetorical study of the philosophical dialogues by Zhuangzi and Plato presented at the Polish Cognitive Linguistics Association Conference 2019, 26-28 September 2019, Bialystok, Poland.

[8] Xiang, M. “More or less? You be the judge!”: An intersubjective study on an underspecified interrogative construction in an early Daoist text presented at the Annual Conference of the Centre for Excellence in Estonian Studies, May 12-13, 2022, Tartu, Estonian Literary Museum and University of Tartu.

[9] Xiang, M., E. Pascual & A. Bonifazi. Philosophy as therapy: A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the Socratic elenchus in an early Daoist text presented at the 4th Conference of the International Association of Cognitive Semiotics, June 15-18, 2022, the RWTH Aachen University in Aachen (Aix-la-Chapelle), Germany and the KU Leuven, Belgium.

[10] Wang, A. & M. Xiang. When gestures also argue: Multimodal viewpoint shift as a rhetorical strategy in American political talk shows presented at the 9th Language, Culture and Mind International Conference, July 4-7, 2022, University of Almería, Spain.

获奖情况

[1] 浙江大学第四届学生人文社会科学研究优秀成果奖研究生优秀成果特等奖，2018

[2] 江苏省“双创计划”双创博士(世界名校类，高校创新)，2019

[3] 太阳成集团tyc234cc2020届本科毕业论文优秀指导教师，2020

[4] 全国大学英语竞赛特等奖、一等奖优秀指导教师，2022

[5] 全国大学英语竞赛一等奖优秀指导教师，2023

[6] 第九届 “LSCAT〞杯江苏省笔译大赛一等奖/笔译之星优秀指导教师，2023

[7] 太阳成集团tyc234cc2023届本科毕业论文优秀指导教师，2023

[8] 全国口译大赛（英语）江苏赛区复赛一等奖优秀指导教师，2023